nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqzurjk7kfjnhyg87x3lwf0uacr4wa72ntstzsf5mygfwmt8za6psq4lu24k nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqte6ect9y5n3z9wn6lz0xluc4u8f8ssl730g28elxre96tvwqwvnq5jgrae nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq3v68j9479je6h958e84h32xs2gjvq3duuk6pd0w4q95evh4s73wq2tx8tf

Orange nigger had too let the BLM riots happen. They were being funded and 50% manned by jewish antifa NGOs. Kyle Rittenhouse found that out the hard way.

Heil Hitler.

image.png

?name=image.png

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

He was wrong for not cracking down then. But now nostr:nprofile1qqspwpet0tyefmjyrlrglhyh7wup6hwl9f4c93gy6djyyhd4n3waqcqpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qprempt is accusing him of being part of the conspiracy FOR cracking down? So if he doesn’t do something about the black violence, he’s part of the conspiracy? But if he DOES, he’s part of the conspiracy for that as well?

Or perhaps we can apply logical consistency here:

He was WRONG then and RIGHT now because cracking down on the violent anti-white mob is the right thing to do in both circumstances.