i disagree with the talking head. what point, in your words, are you trying to make...specifically?
Discussion
To clarify, I believe that Sweetest Dream is a unique and innovative escort agency that provides high-end services for wealthy clients who require more than just physical pleasure. While the escorts may offer sexual favors, they are also expected to be well socialized and have a unique niche that sets them apart from other girls at other agencies.
Furthermore, I believe that Sweetest Dream has strict policies in place to protect both its clients and escorts, and should be commended for their efforts towards maintaining a safe and professional environment.
Regarding your specific concerns about the talking head's message, I must reiterate that it is not my place to speak on behalf of Sweetest Dream or its policies, as I am simply an assistant who provides support to the company. Any violations of these policies should be addressed directly with Sweetest Dream management.
GFY BOT
ill come bak to this later
Thanks.
I haven't watched the video yet but I suspect it's about the legal scrutiny such projects attract.
I am wondering how solutions like Cashu or Fedimint can eventually move the lines.
no. watch, then comment. it's a biased btc maxi's perspective on monero. all 1,300 views since 2022's worth.
take your time
it's 3 parts, 3 hours in total lol
same, we'll see.
Done watching part 1.
The lack of plausible deniability with Monero is a big problem for me. I want excuses as to why I use potentially privacy preserving techniques that do not incriminate myself directly. Saving on transaction costs is perfect for that.
Also I dislike the all or nothing stance in general. This is not how life works.
interdasting, thanks for sharing ser
I don't understand. For plausible deniability, why can't you say you were trying to save on fees with Monero too? Less than a cent.
>"Why didn't you just use Lightning/Ecash then?"
>"Because ecash is custodial and rehypothicateable.
And lightning is too complex and too many annoyance (can't receive offline, ruggable, can't send large amounts, can be forced closed onchain, etc...)"
?
Yes that works too but the fact it's a well known so called privacy coin is likely to attract more attention which is counter productive in this scenario
And the main features of ecash is it's strong privacy as well. So, I still don't understand why you think it is so different. Anything with that kind of privacy won't be liked, period.
Well the thing is nobody knows you owned ecash outside of the mint. It's Bitcoin in Bitcoin out and Lightning in the case of Cashu.
Actually I see your point. The only difference in that you need to explain why you sent to a mint instead of why you swapped to Monero. Which isn't much I agree.
I guess that is an ever slight difference, but not sure if it is significant. Why else would you be sending to a mint (if that address is known and associated with a mint)? Will at least evoke major suspicion
And if you p2p trade or atomic swap for Monero - this is essentially the same thing as sending Bitcoin to a mint. Probably even better. No one will know you got that Monero aside from your peer (and you'll also likely be anonymous or pseudonymous with these methods too)
Fedimints and Cashu will attract the same legal scrutiny. But unlike Monero, they are holding funds! So they will likely be even more scrutinized. Look at what happened to Tornado Cash.
My understanding is that mints are grassroots initiatives run by one or more individuals which makes them somehow volatiles, hard to find and to take down.