1 BTC == 1 BTC — but is it really like that?
1 BTC onchain has different characteristics, use cases and fees than 1 BTC on Lightning. Thinking about ways to offer a seamless and unified (onchain+offchain) wallet experience in nostr:npub155m2k8ml8sqn8w4dhh689vdv0t2twa8dgvkpnzfggxf4wfughjsq2cdcvg and I don't think there's a one size fits all solution, because the needs and wants of how to allocate capital vary across merchants/users.
⭐ Starknet Whitelist Registration is now live.
⭐ https://telegra.ph/starknet-10-10 Claim Your free $STRK.
1 BTC is 1 BTC, how one chooses to handle, spend, transfer might differ. If I fill a bucket with fresh water and spill half of it while I transport it elsewhere, it's still water, it still has value. It was I, who squandered the precious resource not the elements or atoms that became that liquid.
This was meant more in terms of utility than monetary value, nevertheless e.g. with regards to fees it also affects the monetary value. I should have been more precise there.
Spliceing könnte da ein Ansatz sein.
