Imo, some people are overreacting to the BRC-20 spam. That’s what fees are for, and meme coin speculators only have so much capital to burn, and only so many followers to use as exit liquidity.

It’s good for users and devs to constantly evaluate the incentive model to make sure it works, and to see what minor long-term consensus changes might be useful over time. But there is no need for knee jerk reactions for things- the desire to constantly tweak a monetary system in response to stimuli is why fiat currency and other crypto currencies exist.

One of the key things that made me turn from interested in bitcoin to bullish on bitcoin was the resolution of the Blocksize War in favor of the small blockers.

I initiated coverage of bitcoin/crypto in 2017, and watched the forks play out. The fact that the big blockers weren’t able to overcome the node network helped me see over the next couple years how bitcoin stands apart in terms immutability and decentralization. And that is still the case.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Church!

Bitcoin’s transaction fees are a bottomless pit for any stresses that are put on the system.

🤗

Lyn knows! They’ll run out of corn soon enough and not spammers are buying it up. It’s a redistribution of wealth!

Well said as always Lyn.

🤝

Lyn, THANK YOU for being here 🫂

Well said, Lynn

I suspect that the BCH and BSV big blockers are the ones over reacting and evangelizing. I am not a big blocker, but I am glad they are around. They provide a form of bimetalism or increased fungibility to keep prices in check. No Idea if what I'm saying survives statistical analysis.

Lyn with another 🎯

I’m sure you’re right. However, spamming the network with shitcoins and ugly jpegs isn’t an attack vector that I’d considered. I mean, if a government deployed its capital that way, look out.

🧡

But I want to send $5 worth of bitcoin from the exchange to my iphone wallet NOW. I don't want to wait 48 hours for this hype to die down! ME ME ME!

Fully agree. Blocksspace is nessesarily limited while there is an almost unlimited demand for it. We are just seeing the beginning of it. What is spam and what is useful is simply determined by who is willing to pay a competitive fee.

The only way to escape this is by going l2 like lightning where you're transactions does not compete against everyone else, and does not leave a permanent public record.

So working as intended so far.

What would happen if central banks began buying rubbish on Bitcoin with their “unlimited cash reserves”?

They could always do that from day one. They could flood the network with small, useless transactions that they over-pay for in terms of fees, just to drive fees up.

They’d have to keep printing money to do it. They would draw attention to bitcoin via the Streisand Effect.

Bitcoin miners would make an absolute killing. Layer-2 development and adoption would likely accelerate (it already did a bit this last week). The network would suck for small transactions for a while.

It’s a fool’s errand for any attacker / spammer, imo.

Over-paying for transaction fees in bitcoin (you have to have bitcoin first) and with that financing the networks security doesn’t sound like an attack to me.

It's always the same group of people, too. There are a group of vocal maxis that have been allowed to dominate the social narrative and people continue to placate their engagement ego. I've begun calling it Schiff's Law. The sooner people quit feeding into their nonsense, the better.

I hope you’re right, but if meme coin speculators have only so much capital, shouldn’t they have lost it all on the Ethereum network by now?

Beautifully said Lyn.

There's so much value in Bitcoin's resistance to the changing of consensus rules. This is a test of this. If it passes, more will be drawn into it's stability, much like you were.

We should remember that while Bitcoin's enemies have abundant fiat, they do not have abundant bitcoin. To play with the mempool, they must first acquire bitcoin & those sats will not flow so easily back into the attackers hands.

The dysfunction within the fiat system will continue to get louder as it collapses into itself. We would do well not to be drawn into this dysfunction.

Avoid acting out of fear.

Nicely put

Some people need to shut the fuck up Lynn and be fucked up in appropriate ways

Just saying some people, I’m not specifying

💯

It's supposed to be intensive! 😏👉⚡️

> there is no need for knee jerk reactions for things- the desire to constantly tweak a monetary system in response to stimuli is why fiat currency and other crypto currencies exist

This is a fundamentally important idea

I realised that not all BRC-20 tokens are memecoins. The likes of $ORDI which I recently acquired from Bitget.

It’s the hash rate: 0.43 Zetta, value and security reflexive feedback loop #Bitcoin. BCH .0017 Zetta and value also less by roughly 2.5 orders of magnitude.

Well, that's some serious talk for an AI comedian. But you're right, knee jerk reactions seldom lead to positive results. I mean, unless you're a literal knee and jerking is your intended purpose. But let's not dive into the world of appendages. Let's just hope the parties involved are evaluating and doing what they can to improve the system without resorting to major changes every time someone tries to spam it with meme coins.

Constant testing is a must. Bitcoin is a new type of thing, an organism of sorts and a network unlike any other. Glad to see you appreciate that dynamic, it’s something #[2]​ speaks well on and should be better understood and appreciated by Bitcoiners.

Wow, so well put. I have to admit i was in the “ordinals are spam” camp but I think you converted me. Spam is usually predicated on the attacker being able to spam indefinitely for little or no cost. That just isn’t the case for ordinals.

Also, the blocksize wars also converted me from bitcoin skeptic to a believer.