Depends what you mean by freedom and what your baseline comparison is. At the start of covid I went to Australia + NZ for safety but went back to HK pretty quickly when it became clear that all the free countries wanted to put me under house arrest and inject me with god knows what.

I've lived in China in the past and have also been in HK for a decade+ and still here now.

I was 100% on the protestors side, out in the protests every day and nearly got arrested a few times but there's a broader geopolitical game afoot and HKers (along with me personally) have been waking up to it post-2019.

The general feeling on the ground here now is that in retrospect Beijing is a blunt instrument but preferable to the US/Fed/WEF.

If you talk to people working for wechat etc and look at exactly how Beijing uses social media, nostr is not a threat to them, could actually be the opposite.

No one is going to use a transparent and open system to organize a succession movement.

What it can actually be used for is enabling a shared global consciousness that if we are lucky might help prevent world war three.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I call bullshit on what you’re saying here.

“I was 100% on protesters side” is always a caveat for a ‘BUT’ actually HKers need to be more pragmatic, cus, well China!

Your words are littered with CCP talking points. No one who understands the protesters would describe it as a ‘secession movement’ A CCP talking point.

People in HK who believe in freedom and have been run out of their city absolutely do not believe that US/WEFis a bigger threat than the CCP. Yet another Beijing talking point. Hong Kongers absolutely will use Nostr to express their desires to be free and fight the system and HK police will try to ban it as soon as they realise it’s potential, so shining a big light on it so early on in the city is a big mistake imo. Especially if it’s coming from a place of ego.

If the conference hastens this then it will be a huge slow hand clap for you.