Creatine is high time preference by definition, the shit you're buying is completely synthetic.
It doesn't occur in nature in this form.
Start citing studies, use your sources - go ahead.
I'll use my intuition, don't affect me either.
Discussion
You’re the one asserting creatine is dangerous, so the onus is on you to show the evidence that supports this claim.
Who knows maybe there is some crazy side effect that kicks in after 50 years, but the decades of research, anecdotal evidence, and my personal experience tells me that’s unlikely to happen. Either way, I’m not interested in arguing over intuition so we can agree to disagree.
I'm the one asserting synthetic supplements are unhealthy, yes.
The onus is on you, the taker to ingest information - intuitively - this substance doesn't exist without artificial chemicals.
If you want to risk it all just to get the "benefits" fine, but quoting the "30 years of research" is pure Idiocracy as there's too many confounding variables to discuss this properly.
My goal is to live a long healthy life, so I adjust for the hubris of man by staying away from all synthetics - this provides me concrete value...
Keep reading PDFs on the internet & living your life through them.
Blessings on blessings good luck g 🙏.
And you keep listening your intuition even when there’s no real world evidence to validate it 🙏🏼
There is real world evidence to validate that synthetic chemicals ingested to achieve high time preference results usually leads to some issues.
Whether we can trace it back to that is tough to say.
I feel the need to repeat this as you're stuck on the idea that it has zero drawbacks - if that was the case they wouldn't be cautioning people with kidney issues to not ingest it.
The only point I'm trying to make:
-> there is zero need to ingest anything synthetic if you want to be healthy & live a long life.
If you want to argue against this point be my guest.