So… nostr

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

πŸ˜‚

Link, ser? I’d like to read this.

β€œWhen data is kept indefinitely by default, it changes our relationship with that software. People sometimes may hesitate to create anything in shared spaces for fear of cluttering them, while others might indiscriminately litter them.” 🎯

Gotta find more uses for the expires tag

Isnt that dangerous? Since once posted, anything can be saved, scraped and stored out of the system. It could make some people post something they assume will be forgoten only to be surprised when someone saves it.

No.

well no but actually yes

Nah

Snapchat proves it

Not really

πŸ’―% it does. But let's not argue when you are wrong.

And my company is out here building a system where programs run forever, can move transparently between host machines, and data is persisted forever in an event log.

Looks like we'll have an epic ideological battle on our hands πŸ˜‰

So tired of this line of thought … πŸ’­

I misread your comment, my apologies.

I think different applications call for different solutions, and there's room for both schools of thought. Not everything should be ephemeral, and not everything should be saved forever. Nuance, gentlemen.

Agreed

Unison?

Very similar to unison. But our whole stack is open source and self-hostable.

Unison has all their weird proprietary stuff

Data is often more a waste product than an asset

Running a nostr node for ling time is hard. Many will give it up and remove the setup after a while.

Sounds like, burning down a library, but slowly.

I use Backblaze for that. I thought all my data would be saved but alas no, they forgot a bunch of it!