100 FUCKING PERCENT, AGREED!

https://blossom.primal.net/f2c9448fe97372c58d620173d29d4ced1fa042714bfbd160b9fd900b920fbe2a.mov

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Sounds good. Keen to hear counter points to this.

There aren't because he is not arguing anything; he is just pointing out what is happening.

I wouldn't fund "infinite bitcoin development" either, but the network depends on a minimum required maitanance. If the developers do not maintain the software, the bitcoin will die.

If the choice is between:

a. Fund no development

b. Fund extra fancy development

b. is the game theory optimal solution for the developers.

a. funds no development, therefore giving developers an incentive to fund extra fancy development.

If Saylor is correct and I am correct in my belief that human action is based on incintives, both scenarios will eventually kill bitcoin.

The game theory optimal solution, assuming we want bitcoin to survive is to fund the changes you want to see in the world.

If I had $200,000,000 to buy #bitcoin in 2014 instead of $20, I would pay huge bounties for software maintanance and critical bug fixes to change the incentives.

What maintenance does it need?

Lbraries that update require compatibity updates. You can't just run bitcoin core 29 forever.

I learned about it on SLP 404.

https://noderunners.network/en/media/stephan-livera-podcast/stephan-livera-podcast/slp404-gloria-zhao-what-do-bitcoin-core-maintainers-do/89563

I would freeze the code and work on quantum resistance for the next 15 years.

I wouldn’t.

The strongest incentive to not do harm, is a developer that has most if not all of their net worth in the network

How does a developer get a net worth 5,250,000 from now?

Working on bitcoin is an incentive alone. Not every incentive pays money.

I watched this boring ass thing and right at the end the question prompting this response was asked, this is the first time I found myself not rolling my eyes into my throat listening to him.

This is correct and at this point very correct!

"If I wanted to destroy Bitcoin, I would just fund infinite developers who are very talented and tell them to make it better."

nostr:nevent1qqsrzgdtktyat28mlup6eu3pc36nngs0lxv9xfx4rnlneyaetv9f9gcpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgw9xq9w

God Bless nostr:nprofile1qyx8wumn8ghj7cnjvghxjmcpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqqg9rg869l7t43ats5gdsqrqh6njn5wjf0jpe0unvpekkredvllr6nqwfmhjz

You cannot improve the Best.

Ah now I know why the german bitcoin community slowly wakes up 🤣. Their lord and savior has spoken and changed the core overtone window.

He is right in this case though 👍

nostr:nevent1qqsrzgdtktyat28mlup6eu3pc36nngs0lxv9xfx4rnlneyaetv9f9gcpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgq3q2h358ejcjpeaxyhu4vcqwhjtg6qndxm9gk007d48utlylzq2e5dsxpqqqqqqzsqfu6z

He is so well spoken

Diplomacy god

Saylor delivered a surgically precise F U to core developers like a Templar assassin...master class in ass whooping with gentle words and polite language a 5yr old kindergarten will get a gold star for