Would carbon based life forms benefit from an increase in CO2 in the atmosphere?
"Earth's soil is releasing roughly nine times more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere than all human activities combined."
Discussion
Do I believe BTC as drug money the reason it should not exist? No.
How about a currency for cybercrime, or to evade capital controls on enemies of the state?
How about ESG? No not at all. But it’s the current attack vector.
These are all false narratives aimed at Bitcoin, this work is about putting the record straight in order to accelerate its adoption.
And all CO2 in the atmosphere is but a minuscule fraction of all other GHG.
More water evaporates every day from the oceans than the volume of all oil reserves in the world
#GreenhouseGases
And of all the CO2 generated by humans, the portion directly resulting from burning fossil fuels isn’t that big.
Anyone who ever drove through the smoke of a forest fire understands how stupid is the idea of stopping climate change by driving an electric car or giving up beef.
I’m not sure how accurate, but I saw estimates that 1/2 of forest fires are accidentally man-made.
A tiny effort in managing those would reduce more CO2 than all the world deciding to be poor and starve.
Yet all we hear about is that we should give up everything to “save the planet”.