Zapping 1 sat - is it a go or a no-go?

When I get a zap, it gets delivered, telegram sends me a message which sends the message to my watch. So the energy used is more expensive than the sat which has been sent.

What is your opinion?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Lazarus once said.. i just want one pizza...

I vote shut off the notifications and stack and share zaps

It‘s more a general question if it makes sense. Also regardless of the energy usage. It was just one thought.

You can zap me singles all you want.

#[0]

Singles. Hahaha omg 😳 🤣🤣🤣 now I feel gross

I wish a 🤙 would cost 1 sat. I would be happy to do that.

Probably need to make sure it is long press or something because I accidentally 🤙 just scrolling.

Cost to engaging is good imo.

Wait this is a great idea. And the engagement sats will go to the developer of the client you are using.

💯

Repost is putting content on your timeline(ie your reputation. I’m okay with 0 or 1 sat to do that)

Commenting should be variable by creator. Tired of spam. 100sats to comment. Need more engagement. 0 sats.

🤙 baseline 1 sat is good across the board as it’s the lowest fee for engagement.

All zaps are good zaps. Proving the network is more important than that energy loss.

Good point

A zap is a ⚡️

For me there are 2 possible amounts: 69 or 420. The rest is FUD

🫡 or 69420 / 42069

Then why not 69*420 and multiples! 😂

?cid=2154d3d7gdkjej2z6gd19feerfo3laoazkpp4o2m8k7qiy9q&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g