yeah i hear you. but this op return limit change, despite the controversy, is not a consensus change.
Discussion
Yeah so I am a retard but I still don’t understand how it fixes anything.
I just can’t see utxo bloat as a problem. It’s 13gb in a 700+ gb disk when you run node and electrum. People are going to buy 2tb disk soon and they are less than $100. Even 4tb instead for under $250.
Yet it seems like the main reason the 140iq people are making to the 80iq people is to be scared of “utxo bloat” but nothing is stopping a real attacker from bloating the utxo set anyway.
So in the event of a real attack, how does less filter options help anyone? That’s what I end up thinking.
i mostly agree with you and did just upgrade to 2T. but I am confused because many voices i considered ‘trusted’ are saying the change is fine.
my sense is that the limit should just remain. but also that i have no say over it beyond running a different implementation
Watching the vod and debates from Bitcoin++ today
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rsMujxqgHeQ
Core dev panel at 6:10
At the end of the day it’s not a consensus change it’s a default policy change. Which also removes the option to set a limit tho.
But yeah that’s my point, there are plenty of us who will not update to that version of the software- look at the nodes online, only 5% are running the latest core update- so how does this change actually make sure the bigger op_returns are relayed?
And idk if I just don’t understand the 180iq genius core devs but I just have a terrible impression of their vibe. They are so defensive about it.
agreed. i watched shinobi chatting to danny and he came across like a climate hysteric
Core are saying the update makes your node work better for the network.
if you dont know why, then don’t update
https://gist.github.com/instagibbs/c436110890ab25aa9997b13c2270d5ce
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RYvtaTkL9tM
Retard you are slipping into 100iq true midwit npc status
80iq says no update fuck the scammers