This is great. — This is a comment on: https://yakihonne.com/article/naddr1qq2hyetnwpjkxapdw35x2ttp943k7mn5v4u8gq3qwf4pufsucer5va8g9p0rj5dnhvfeh6d8w0g6eayaep5dhps6rsgsxpqqqp65wxaj0m5
Discussion
Yeah I’ve noticed this same confusion in scanning comments and didn’t even realize what it was about. 😆
I had no idea it put the extra stuff on the comments. 😅
I understand this extra stuff is added to provide context but doesn't feel like a good solution. nostr:nprofile1qqszpxr0hql8whvk6xyv5hya7yxwd4snur4hu4mg5rctz2ehekkzrvcpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6vp39eukz6mfdphkumn99e3k7mf0qy0hwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytfsxghxgmmjv9nxzcm5dae8jtn0wfnj7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09uc2mskg would you mind removing that messaging and add an `e` tag to the appropriate ID? 🙏 We discussed it here: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/809 . This way replies on long-form notes will not be out of context in social timelines
Noted, we will look into it.