The ₿ symbol for sats is growing on me. What do you think?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It doesn't make sense..

It destroys the 21M hard cap narrative built in 15years.

Sats

Are

The

Standard

愚蠢的

You mean the 2.1 quadrillion hard cap? 😄

Its only stupid 🙄

👎

$100

$.10

$.01

Common sensical

🧡👊🏻🍻

I don’t hate that

Makes no sense

Nonsense

👎

I prefer the sats symbol

"Bitcoin is too confusing for normies"

"Well then, let's use the Bitcoin symbol for sats. We don't want them to be not confused"

Me to.

We tested zaps on this note… we made five attempts to⚡zap this note, at purewater@blitz-wallet.com, over a period of 11 minutes. Three of the zaps were successfully paid... Your server did produce invoices, however, we were unable to successfully pay the invoices. It may be that your node or wallet service was offline at the time we attempted the zaps. If you wanted to fix this... you could try getting a free Rizful account to reliably receive zaps -- https://rizful.com ... then, pls reply here so we can ⚡zap you some sats to be sure it's working.

Don't care ... the comma as thousands delimiter confuses me more than the ₿

Thousands delimiter adjusts based on device region. You’ll see a period in Europe.

Nope 👎

No

It confuses me more tbh.

I don't care one way or the other, let the free market sort this one out

It looks nice

I love it. And when we get used to it we can simply find consensus to allow these new smaller Bitcoin to themselves be able to subdivide into 100,000,000 Satoshis. Repeating this adjustment every so often, or more gradually such as adding another zero of division every halving. Then the network will never stop mining ever smaller fractions of Bitcoin, forever mining but never reaching the full 21,000,000 limit.

nostr:nevent1qqsr9wu6zsj057fnrwtkx8xhk4fs90ell3cls9l6mq5wqxqk47r00vqpramhxue69uh5ummnw3ezuetfde6kuer6wasku7nfvuh8xurpvdjsygp3rdyhvdv9vanl7hqua73t33wgwh8psjhysak6jfu7s2d6q8w39ypsgqqqqqqs065gl6

Yay I'll soon catch up with Saylor

Noise isn’t proof of work.

Why don't you use spark.money instead of liquid? Thanks.

stability and speed.

Spark isn‘t ready yet and has all sorts of bugs and performance issues. Sending/receiving took 20+ seconds during my tests this week (sometimes sending didn‘t work at all).

Having said that it‘s a stellar team and I‘m sure it‘s just a matter of time until the quality is there and issues are ironed out.

Understand. Yes, things are progressing fast. I hope you migrate to Spark in future. Thanks.