That makes no sense….
All the blocks are the same no matter what node implementation you choose to run…
That makes no sense….
All the blocks are the same no matter what node implementation you choose to run…
My understanding is core may allow larger files in, which would therefore take up more space.. I am merely speculating from my very limited understanding.
That’s wrong.
The block size isn’t being changed.
So blocks aren’t any bigger in core 30 then they where for core 29, 28, 27, knots, 29, 28, 27 etc
You can contribute to having less spam make it into the blockchain.
This is the info that made me think that….
Core’s Plan: In its v30 release (slated for October 2025), Core proposes removing the default 80-byte limit on OP_RETURN—a script opcode for embedding small amounts of arbitrary data in transactions (e.g., for timestamps or proofs). Proponents like Peter Todd and Jameson Lopp argue this boosts flexibility for “innovation” like digital art, document verification, or NFTs on Bitcoin, while letting the fee market decide what gets mined. They say it reduces “harmful workarounds” (like fake addresses) and aligns with Bitcoin’s neutrality: if a transaction is valid and pays fees, nodes shouldn’t block it by default.