it is 2023 and people still think the concern over larger block sizes is storage cost rather than bandwidth, smfh

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

4tb is $80 on Amazon lol

I wouldn't pay that much -> less decentralization -> no need to use blockchain to begin with.

Bitcoin is Timechain not blockchain

True that. We can handle the blocsize and increase as it is now.

If it's an HDD then it likely has shingled magnetic recording - SMR, a technology used to cram more storage but the downside is a tremendous performance penalty. Like XX seconds to sync a single modern block. Mostly useless for a node. Storage space may have gotten cheaper but at a performance cost that makes these SMR drives unusable.

Disk read / write bandwidth is a big deal…I’m not certain bitcoin core is well optimized in terms of disk read/write

At roughly 4MB neither is a problem

nostr.build have loads of storage, we are using a fraction of the max allocated amount.

In the meantime I’m getting overage charges left and right on my TX-Out…

*has

I thought LN kinda ended this debate.

There are a variety of concerns and arguably there is merit to a few of them.

I wholeheartedly agree

Why must you be so sensible

note19dt979yan0vahlhc2xhl4np6rjeh7v9xsnzwqyqvmexc7fydscps723htz

LukeJr made some very valid points with 300 kilobyte blocks

https://www.merklereport.com/transcript-luke-jr-discusses-keeping-the-block-size-small/