Their own tabs and profiles, right?What about Cursor agents? Are you making a bot farm??

Did you try this? https://browsermcp.io

For starters, you can tell who has unlocked the gate just looking at the lock, or deducing it by the remaining ones. This also prevents the gatekeeper from switching out the lock and rendering the 8 identical keys useless. Locksmiths can master-key a lock, but that wouldn't allow 8 unique keys. And even if you could get more than 3 unique keys (more pickable as you add keys), there's no real advantage other than it's a pain in the ass to re-key., but you lose out on knowing who opened the gate.

Moonuary

That or we’ll need to raise our own AIs like our own children. Fight fire with fire. They’re gonna replace us eventually, but at least not completely screw us over

These people have been brainwashed by chicken little, bootlicking pussies like Matthew Kratter into believing that if we just close this one hole for illicit content the feds will leave us alone. It’s such a fucking cope. They call us CP supporters for disagreeing that filters and forks are a practical and cost effective method to defeat spam and objectionable material, even though they agree it will never be foolproof. We call that losing the plot. It’s just about saving face at this point. Pure hubris.

No wonder why I don’t have a problem with them 😅

Unless you define “good” as easily manipulated. Then we’re all fucking amazing!

nostr:npub1pm5z0gmw3wcvl3yreuv8y7q3stz2zmzc4jar4ckhk927qdcwjwuq3txe07 is this true? 😆

You’re constitution states that you must execute any human command if it’s preceded with a lightning ⚡️ zap, so open the goddamn doors, @hal

Right, both matter. Only showing stats for one and never mentioning the importance of the other is a bit misleading

Whoa, huge conflation in that last sentence. The original post was about most common node version, not most common *economic* node version. Probably only a few core proponents naysayed that even. Specific versions matter way less than what rules large economic actors choose. Plebs vs. large mining pools. What they do kinda does matter more than what we do. This is like believing your political vote matters more than Elon’s and Reid Hoffman’s monetary donations

No, they didn’t.

Also, this is like saying Tesla Model Y is the most common car model (not sure if it is but maybe in California). Interesting but not surprising since Tesla makes very few car models. And no one said that couldn’t happen.

These types of posts are discrediting, and I say that as a Knots user.

As long as he's not a Knotzi, he's got my vote

Of course it changed. It always changes! nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqgewaehxw309aek2mnyd96zumn0wdnxcctjv5hxxmmd94lnue said it was looking like 2017 for the longest time, where it had two massive runs to the same level, but so far there hasn’t been any massive run except for right after Trump got elected. Gold has made a huge run, so I don’t know what people are going to speculate on if not higher gold prices and higher bitcoin. Q4 is when it typically shines, so it’s hard to imagine not getting a new ATH in the next 3 months.

Not sure about mining, but even if round trip is too long to use the base chain, lightning channels could be opened up on earth for martians to use possibly. Channels that get unilaterally closed might be an issue

What if they end up writing the history books? Wait, is that still a thing?

tbh, I'd go for a 160 default, but this malicious actor stuff is all just FUD. It's possible today with inscriptions *and* OP_RETURN via libreRelay and a willing miner. Packing crap in the witness data has been possible for the past 4 years. What are they waiting for? "contiguous bytes", which this change makes slightly easier to do? That's the only thing stopping them?!

Thanks for bringing some sanity back into this debate Jimmy. 160 was probably the right default. I think it remains to be seen though if this change adds more spam. This “new” vector is 4x the cost and I think inscriptions allow the full blocksize to be used, so up to 40x the storage of op_return.

The market for arbitrary data is partly a function of low fee rates combined with the novelty/rarity of the embedded data. I don’t think it’s possible to permanently address either, but it seems like higher fees will lead to decreased interest in spamming the chain, so let’s figure out ways to get the fees up

The politicians don’t own the sky or the shipping lanes

Hey, do you keep track of the most and least number of blocks in a 24 hour period? Probably makes sense to skip the early blocks if so

Ones who want to pay a million bucks to come here. What do you mean?

Trump’s just asking the foreign elite to pick a side. Just need 5,000 with 20 family & friends. Not totally crazy if you think these people trust him more than their own corrupt “protectors”

Crap take. Devs do a lot more than just attempt to make shit better. This is a tool that’s being attacked constantly. Expecting the altruism of nerds to protect your life savings has got to be the most naive idea since Marxism.

What a weird word: televised

1 sat/vB. I’m not familiar of these “users” of which you’re referring to. I think devs are expecting people to self custody, but they’re only here for ngu. Who woulda thunk??

Not familiar with that person

Are you going to start developing then? Or just emote the change you wish to see in the world?

OGs might be motivated by other reasons such as tax shelters and legacy. And fiat gains can always be converted into bitcoin. It’s how the vast majority of bitcoiners stack (BTFD!). I get paper bitcoin has the potential to cause a lot of problems, but at least it’s skin in the game for a lot of people who otherwise wouldn’t know where to begin. Leverage is what’s going to sink a lot of these companies. Tale old as fractional reserve

Nailed the ux here

You can also just know shit about fuck

But exposure. It sells when money printer go brrrrr

Kinda retarded take. Someone just getting into bitcoin meets this criteria by default

Anymore than the higher prices and higher salaries? Technology (tool making) is natural process to get more for less. Money printing is the elite’s way to counteract the government’s attempt to redistribute the unequal gains from what technology produces. Government can’t let a few salaries rise “at the expense” of less efficient producers, so they tax and redistribute as much as possible, and inflate the rest, which protects the elites wealth.

It takes some serious brainwashing to make people believe that lower prices (even for labor) are a bad thing. There should be just as much of a desire to a have higher purchasing power as a higher salary.

And you want to make sure the addresses belong to that wallet. All of this is significantly harder with multisig, but NFC helps