Crap take. Devs do a lot more than just attempt to make shit better. This is a tool that’s being attacked constantly. Expecting the altruism of nerds to protect your life savings has got to be the most naive idea since Marxism.
Saylor was right not to fund devs.
"If I wanted to destroy bitcoin, I would just fund infinite developers who are very talented and tell them to make it better."
Thankfully, Knots’ rejection of the Op_Return increase is a “healthy response” to Core v30’s overreach.
https://blossom.primal.net/f2c9448fe97372c58d620173d29d4ced1fa042714bfbd160b9fd900b920fbe2a.mov
Discussion
Mothers have the most important job in the world, therefore we should ignore all men, and all childless women on all topics and let only mothers run the world.
Sorry, but does that have anything to do with what I wrote?
Show me the incentives and I’ll show you the outcome.
Right, so what incentive is there to pay a 4x fee to write arbitrary data to the chain? What incentive is there for Core to do nothing and allow the UTXO set bloat from non-op_return hacks?
You get good and bad in any group. Some of the core devs are about to make a (rare) mistake. That should not be funded blindly. Saylor knows.