Seeing more and more talk about cost of capital concerns on #Bitcoin lightning channels. I'm not sure cost of capital is the correct framing in the argument? Is this not first a safety / risk of loss and then networking, routing or connectedness concern rather than CoC. Once above is solved we can more accurately price the risk of lightning channel (and benefit of liquidity) vs. safety of cold storage.
Am I thinking about this incorrectly?
nostr:npub139nl9yxvwayl60fr97m3zrq9md6x5v0uup344mkyuyg6mzlusyxs4zkwf4
nostr:npub1sfhflz2msx45rfzjyf5tyj0x35pv4qtq3hh4v2jf8nhrtl79cavsl2ymqt
nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a
nostr:npub1mxrssnzg8y9zjr6a9g6xqwhxfa23xlvmftluakxqatsrp6ez9gjssu0htc
nostr:npub1uyz4w2w4rcphk0q5arzkutrecgscxwzajj4dkvh9mjyqjtxslm6qea8632