I think you are thinking along exactly the right lines, just being a bit too pedantic about the terminology. there are risks and costs with “deploying” bitcoin in this way that have no analogue in tradfi, but I firmly believe “cost of capital” still applies. the proper understanding of CoC is something like “opportunity cost of alternative deployment” - you clearly have to think about that here and the risk/reward tradeoff may be new, but the principles guiding the decision are the same at a high level.
Seeing more and more talk about cost of capital concerns on #Bitcoin lightning channels. I'm not sure cost of capital is the correct framing in the argument? Is this not first a safety / risk of loss and then networking, routing or connectedness concern rather than CoC. Once above is solved we can more accurately price the risk of lightning channel (and benefit of liquidity) vs. safety of cold storage.
Am I thinking about this incorrectly?
nostr:npub139nl9yxvwayl60fr97m3zrq9md6x5v0uup344mkyuyg6mzlusyxs4zkwf4
nostr:npub1sfhflz2msx45rfzjyf5tyj0x35pv4qtq3hh4v2jf8nhrtl79cavsl2ymqt
nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a
nostr:npub1mxrssnzg8y9zjr6a9g6xqwhxfa23xlvmftluakxqatsrp6ez9gjssu0htc
nostr:npub1uyz4w2w4rcphk0q5arzkutrecgscxwzajj4dkvh9mjyqjtxslm6qea8632
Discussion
No replies yet.