Who reviews core?
Knots is a minor fork of Core.
Who reviews core?
Knots is a minor fork of Core.
> Knots is a minor fork of Core.
How do you know, have you reviewed it ?
Most of the competent bitcoin software engineers review Core in a formal rough consensus review process (look it up). How do you know knots is a minor fork and isn’t introducing a security flaw? Is that based on your ability to review code? If other bitcoin software engineers thought took the time to review knots and decided it had a flaw, how would they stop Luke from publishing an update he wants published?
Both are open source.
Any developer can review Knots.
BTW yes I could review Knots code. I am a developer too.
The original point from Odell was about the review release PROCESS. Do you participate in the review release process for knots or are you just another “I could review it if I wanted to”. If you do, great, please explain the process to us and how you would prevent Luke from publishing something he thinks is good but the other knots developers thinks is a security risk.