Ok then, let's dig up that cunt up.
Apart from the fact that he genuinely believed that all boys want to fuck their mothers and kill their fathers (literally), he normalized adult-child sexual interest.
There is also criticism that Freudâs reinterpretation of abuse disclosures as fantasies set back the recognition and treatment of child sexual abuse for decades.
Idk if he believed they wanted to fuck their moms but that there was attraction for the opposite sex parent. My psychology professor in college said she used to always think that Freudâs theories were nonsense until she had a son and he told her, as a toddler, that he wanted to marry her. I used to think that too as a baby but it wasnât sexual and I grew out of the jealousy phase toward my dad. I also used to think that girls were just boys that had their dicks chopped off.
Regarding abuse fantasies, it is well documented that some adult women have rape fantasies but it doesnât necessarily mean they want to be raped. I think itâs more a desire to submit totally to a man they want. It might be a primal urge that stems from our early primate ancestors. Aggression/dominance in the animal kingdom is perceived to be strong so there is a weird line where women are attracted to dangerous men but also want to feel safe. Sexuality is very complex haha itâs partially a social construct. A lot of things people find sexually attractive are relative to the times we live in. People werenât eating ass 50 years ago đ
There's a reason why academia was educated in a Freudian manner, this is how you prolong the grift and enslave humanity even further. It is well-known that porn is a major point of the tiny hats agenda. Also, eating ass is definitely older than 50 years. đ¤
Animals and humans are related backwards to what Darwin "discovered", in the sense that animals are retarded past humans and not humans are the offsprings of animals. The entire 1800s is dedicated to change the minds of mankind. The fact that it was so successful shows how long the coming to light will take. Of course tho, there's no hurry in going back to Eden (for parts of humanity anyway).
The underlying problem of psychiatry and psychology is the deeply materialistic roots. My research has shown me that this is not the way, but it's probably kind of a mandatory route for many. Each when ready probably.
People are willful slaves. Itâs not academia or Freudâs theories that are holding back humanity đ
Porn wasnât prevalent during Freudâs life.
Also Jesus was a âtiny hatâ too technically. Is that bad?
It was a build-up to internet porn. You needed useful idiots to enforce it and academia was groomed to mass produce serfs. Even Jung noticed the such tendencies in Freud and walked a different path from him. They were close friends once.
Jesus was not a tiny hat. Tiny hats is a minority within the so-called Jews. There is not a single mention that Jesus had a big nose or scammed people with usury and whatnot. Quite the opposite was the case. Lookup Jesus at the temple, it's one of the few moments of violence.
You give these people too much credit. Thereâs no way they could predict internet porn back then so how could they build up to it? Also, Jung mostly agreed with Freud on everything except the sexual stuff. And keep in mind that the theories about unconscious processes were mostly from Freud. So even though he is wrong about the underlying motivation, he was right about the unconscious processes causing neuroses. Itâs more likely an error in his theory rather than some evil plan to create problems and misguide people. Freud was atheist too.
Those hats can be worn by any Jew and Jesus was Jewish. If youâre going to distrust Jewish people then why do you still trust Jesus? Iâm familiar with his table flipping at the temple. I think usury is bad but Iâm not a statist so I donât think it should be illegal.
I just explained it's just a tiny minority within the bigger group that's evil and problematic. The rest are clueless.
Revelation 3:9
Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
As for Jesus being a Jew, I'd rather no comment at the moment too much. My short answer would be NO. The universality of Christ makes it irrelevant, He could have been Albanian for all I care.
TL;DR
Birth up to ~30yo we can talk about Jesus.
After the Baptism at Jordan River up until the end of the Golgotha event - Christ unites with Jesus, hence the Jesus Christ.
