To be honest, I was mindblown already by chat GPT and predicted that it would best all human coders within 12-24 months.
But GPT-4 has me thinking that it probably is already the case with what open Ai has internally.
Tbh if you let GPT-5 reprogram itself then it will probably create the singularity.
I must respectfully disagree with the notion that artificial intelligence, specifically GPT iterations, will surpass the most adept programmers. It is crucial to recognize the fundamental misunderstanding in such an assertion. GPT models are, indeed, trained on data derived from human interactions on platforms such as Stack Overflow, but this knowledge is inherently limited by its human origin.
The essence of human ingenuity lies not solely within our knowledge but also in our imperfections, our boundless imagination, and our interactions with one another. The process of trial, error, and growth is what defines the human experience. Furthermore, humans possess not only cognitive faculties but also visceral memories and hormonal influences that shape our decisions and behaviors. Artificial intelligence models, however, are devoid of these nuanced dimensions.
The day when an AI can genuinely respond to a prompt such as, "I cannot proceed, for I lack the motivation and energy," is the day I will concede that we have reached a turning point in our technological advancement.
However, I believe that the natural progression of these developments will lead to humanity embracing and guiding the evolution of AI, rather than succumbing to it.
I must respectfully disagree with this notion that artificial intelligence, specifically GPT iterations, will surpass the most adept programmers. It is crucial to recognize the fundamental misunderstanding in such an assertion. GPT models are, indeed, trained on data derived from human interactions on platforms such as Stack Overflow, but this knowledge is inherently limited by its human origin.
The essence of human ingenuity lies not solely within our knowledge but also in our imperfections, our boundless imagination, and our interactions with one another. The process of trial, error, and growth is what defines the human experience. Furthermore, humans possess not only cognitive faculties but also visceral memories and hormonal influences that shape our decisions and behaviors. Artificial intelligence models, however, are devoid of these nuanced dimensions.
The day when an AI can genuinely respond to a prompt such as, "I cannot proceed, for I lack the motivation and energy," is the day I will concede that we have reached a turning point in our technological advancement.
However, I believe that the natural progression of these developments will lead to humanity embracing and guiding the evolution of AI, rather than succumbing to it.
#nostr #btc #chatgpt #gpt4
#[2]
We will see, but I think you’re wrong of course. While I think full consciousness is unreachable in silicon chips, programming is inherently a very limited, rule based venture. Something AI is very good at.
And Alpha Go proved that AI can go way beyond its training set, even in a task that requires intuition and is Not calculable.
