There's a lot of "public" property out there.
There is a lot of quasi-public property too.
Too big to fail = large enough to decorate.
Discussion
Just because a corporation relies on their bailouts doesn't mean that I want to rely on their bailouts. If it's for communication, then I'd rather do it non-destructively or using my own property.
Seen on Nostr:
"If your economic system has entities too big to fail, then your economic system is not Capitalism".
If a corporation is not a Capitalist enterprise, but a tax-fed regulation-sheltered oligopolistic government leech one-step-removed, then I don't care about its property...
I want to use my government's overreliance on rights violations to defeat it, not rely on my own rights violations to defeat it.
It seems incredibly pathetic to me to cry and whine about all the property that government controls. If we have had the right to it whole time, then we shouldn't need to seize it back by force in the first place.
LOL remind me again whose rights are being violated when anti-regime slogans appear on regime "public property"?
The people's rights. The people's property rights are violated by the government in order to fund the "signposts" you are putting your propoganda on.
But I suppose you aren't directly violating their rights yourself, so my statements about what I want were inaccurate. I was probably mixed up because of the fact that this proposed strategt is just as flawed as if you were to directly violate people's property rights yourself.
What I should have said is that I want to rely on preventing rights violations in order to defeat the government instead of solely relying on all the rights violations that we didn't prevent. If it's just communication, then it should be done some other way. Like a poster and tape.