Yeah, but it's mean to put something on someone else's property that can't be easily removed.
the freedom tech we need is something like this wall printer:
https://youtu.be/-z6H6lN5Shg?si=7Xeiw3zpdvKZyxBh
or better yet something that prints onto interlocking puzzle mats:
that can be bonded to a building exterior wall to create a weather resistant billboard anywhere that cannot be easily ripped off
the entire billboard along with tools to install it must fit in average size backpack
yes it can still be painted over but most people don't carry paint on them. everyone has hands they can use to tear down a paper sign.
the tech must be such that it is faster and easier to install the billboard than to remove it.
the billboard should contain some propaganda message and a QR code that leads to an internet page.
because preaching to the choir is a waste of time. we must reach out to normies and that can only be done in the physical world.
nostr:npub1acg6thl5psv62405rljzkj8spesceyfz2c32udakc2ak0dmvfeyse9p35c
nostr:npub1ye5ptcxfyyxl5vjvdjar2ua3f0hynkjzpx552mu5snj3qmx5pzjscpknpr
nostr:npub1c856kwjk524kef97hazw5e9jlkjq4333r6yxh2rtgefpd894ddpsmq6lkc
nostr:npub1494rtg3ygq4cqawymgs0q3mcj6hucvu4kmadv03s5ey2sg32df5shtzmp0
nostr:npub1xzs45n639h6hdttxhnpye2lcfeddlt3u2xl8zcvz07l9uy8tfpdqvxreq5
Discussion
This is the property of King Charles III, the US Congress or the European Commission.
You are their property, too. That's why you can be locked down and taxed or injected to death.
You own nothing, and you never have.
I will never be the property of another person, no matter how much it might absolve me of responsibility.
People can choose how I die, but they could never choose how I live.
There's a lot of "public" property out there.
There is a lot of quasi-public property too.
Too big to fail = large enough to decorate.
Just because a corporation relies on their bailouts doesn't mean that I want to rely on their bailouts. If it's for communication, then I'd rather do it non-destructively or using my own property.
Seen on Nostr:
"If your economic system has entities too big to fail, then your economic system is not Capitalism".
If a corporation is not a Capitalist enterprise, but a tax-fed regulation-sheltered oligopolistic government leech one-step-removed, then I don't care about its property...
I want to use my government's overreliance on rights violations to defeat it, not rely on my own rights violations to defeat it.
It seems incredibly pathetic to me to cry and whine about all the property that government controls. If we have had the right to it whole time, then we shouldn't need to seize it back by force in the first place.
LOL remind me again whose rights are being violated when anti-regime slogans appear on regime "public property"?
The people's rights. The people's property rights are violated by the government in order to fund the "signposts" you are putting your propoganda on.
But I suppose you aren't directly violating their rights yourself, so my statements about what I want were inaccurate. I was probably mixed up because of the fact that this proposed strategt is just as flawed as if you were to directly violate people's property rights yourself.
What I should have said is that I want to rely on preventing rights violations in order to defeat the government instead of solely relying on all the rights violations that we didn't prevent. If it's just communication, then it should be done some other way. Like a poster and tape.