if there is no difference , why try to create one using different verbiage? one is designed to appeal to an emotional reaction vs a rational one. who are you or i to tell others who to use their property? in what capacity to do so, in what time frame or in what amount? we as individuals can know nothing of what another should or shouldn't do with their things , the only one that can know this is only the one whom bears the cost of such opportunity costs nostr:nprofile1qyw8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytfsxyh8jcttd95x7mnwv5hxxmmdqyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2qpqlxzaxzge0jq9u9cecucctdt5lslwgp7hcxmp2l0wn8r2ecjenwas6czrap
Discussion
Hoarding is the OG term, used by Mises and Rothbard et al.
i dont recall ( in what ive read, albiet a small amount of either so i could be ignorant of the works in which they do) that they use this nomenclature in this way.
See chapter 9 on page 26: The problem of "Hoarding"
https://mises.org/library/book/what-has-government-done-our-money
Obviously he didn't have the problem of hoarders not contributing to network security 😂
You're way out of your depth, have poor reading comprehension, and are creating strawmen. Pathetic.
Not making any strawmen arguments. Basic functions of human knowledge and the lack thereof of each individual only able to have as much relevant to himself and lacks in that in comparison to others.
nobody is arguing that people can't do what they like with their property.
just that there are incentives for particular behaviors and very real consequences to those behaviors.