Replying to Avatar Rich Nost

TIL the drivechains proposal only uses a single byte to identify the sidechain.

That means Drivechains can only support 256 side chains. The solution? Sidechains will have their own sidechains. LOL.

I am not making this shit up.
Avatar
Rich Nost 2y ago

The alternative solution? They just soft fork again. This is the whackiest shit I have ever seen a group of reckless assholes try to yeet onto main.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
ben 2y ago

but drivechains are the last change to bitcoin!

“You can say with some real credibility, now that we have this change we don’t need to change bitcoin anymore”

- Paul Sztorc

https://youtu.be/CuKPIUO1pVA

Avatar
Rich Nost 2y ago

The one thing Im certain of, is that shitcoiners are lazy. They would rather just agitate for another softfork to add a byte than wait on engineers to support sidechains on sidechains. It won't be the last change.

7c
nobody 2y ago

Cringe

Avatar
falsefaucet 2y ago

Yeah I'm sure there isn't some protocol breaking bug due in 2104. Yeah no more changes 🙄

7c
nobody 2y ago

👀🥴

Avatar
Gigi 2y ago

> whackiest shit I have ever seen a group of reckless assholes try to yeet onto main

Followed.