By being inaccessible?
Discussion
Governments don't usually attempt stifling and censoring non-perceived threats. Chokepoint 2.0
I agree, but you must admit governments usually succeed in suppressing innovations perceived as threatening. Chokepoint 2.0 can be seen as a temporising strategy destined to weaken a threat up to the point it can be "digested" by the legal system.
This is usually the fate bestowed to radically new ideas and technologies.
On the white market, yes. The logical conclusion of a permissionless system like Bitcoin, Monero, etc is black market money. Any transaction taking place on the white market is by definition permissioned by a central authority.
Not necessarily permissioned, but taxed.
I'm not saying Bitcoin itself is permissioned. I'm saying any transaction that takes place on the white market is. Bitcoin doesn't avoid this. A tax is just another permission "Pay me this much or you can't transact here"
With Bitcoin you can decide not to pay this tax/follow the regulation, but if you break those rules it's now a black market transaction
What are you talking about?
Monero is accessible. It's pretty much banned from all exchanges in Europe and thanks to Haveno (RetoSwap) we have no problem to buy/sell it for fiat.
Also I can buy giftcards in mere minutes for a lot of daily stuff (food, gas, furniture etc).
Monero is useable and accessible. You only need to know about the options and still need a little bit of technical knowledge.
"a little bit"?
If you can download, install an app on your phone, and able to scan a QR code you're capable of using Monero.
If you can download and install a program on windows/osx/Linux you can buy Monero via Retoswap.
Oh and you need the capability to read.
Should be doable for a lot of people.
Should be?