Errrrr bad take. Please temm me where it says this MUST be implemented by a mint?
Discussion
literally a feature that multiple Bitcoin community projects and businesses have requested that want to transition from normal custodian to ecash.
we're winning, these are just the inevitable screeching noises by NPCs in the background. the more these people screech, the more I know we're doing it right.
The real NPCs are those who lack the competence to build self-custodial projects. I focus on better things and refuse to introduce KYC to benefit corporations.
You are an attacker and will be called out.
Don't you think that we should also help improve the privacy and utility of already existing custodial systems?
No. We should stop using them.
You that is not realistic right? People are going to keep using custodians, so we should use the best available technology for that (ecash)
You are free to help corporations, governments and cucks. I prefer to use available resources to improve self custodial UX.
Compliant ecash already exists since years: https://docs.taler.net/
When is WoS adopting cashu?
Damn you hit a nerve with this one. I know something works when "people" come out of the woodwork to shit on it. 😂
"use my rug factory that I just added KYC to or you're an NPC" yeah real winner argument there much persuade very zap
what did you say? all i hear is screeching.
Bitaxe + ecash =???
Stupid non sense?
Or just it unlock something useful?
You read my mind, anon. I am building it. Check out my talk: nostr:nevent1qqsp0fujkknjwma4krzwmghpgamg0yn2vgleljhlukvskuvdsx4sjpcpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0q9tksar5wpen5te0dehhxarj9ejx7amwd3hkzep0x5unqvfcv5mrydp4x9jkgetzxyckvctxvgunxc3hvvuxxdnpxcmk2wf4xejrvwpcx4jnqwpnxgckvdmy8psnvdtyx93xxdtrxuunzvsp9d58garswvaz7tmhwamju7t0w4682cn99e3k7mf0washgcmg8amr6a2r09fxvejsv3ekz4gzyrfs2t9ru02j8v0vspn3avdm5pgh5t6j9cv4w7xus0ws82xcfgtsuqcyqqqqqqgejd5s9