I'll have to respond with a better response when I have some time (these are fun conversations) so I will ask one thing: are you saying that "everything is subjective" is objectively true?
Discussion
If you zoom out far enough to say we know anything is wrong. When you box yourself in thinking you know it all and at the end of the day you're just meat and electric. Humans like the order but chaos is the way it is. I don't know shit yall are right. My response came from bard I don't have time to explain anything cuz I'm bound by my mortal coding.
There is no right no wrong no middle or left. Just perception. It's true and false at the same damn time.
Nice try fed.
2+2=4
I think what we're trying to differentiate is God's math versus "consciousness math"
Haha nevermind that doesn't make any sense either to a pleb
No sir, I'm differentiating between "objective" and "subjective".
Giving the example of value as "subjective" and the example of math as "objective"
We have a word for perceptions that are incorrect: delusion.
Yall are confusing reality with the nostr
Another question: Would you say people experiencing reality subjectively is an objective fact or a subjective interpretation?
If subjective, why should we believe other people experience things subjectively? Or experience anything at all?
To that I say this. our experience of reality is both subjective and objective at the same time. Our subjective experience is unique to each individual, but it is also grounded in objective reality. Belief that life is good or bad is very important.
So you agree that there is an objective reality and as such objective, but not necessarily universal, truths exist.
Would you disagree with the view that we interpret these truths individually, to a greater or lesser accuracy, and some people have more accurate interpretations of these truths, neither perfect nor complete? Some perspectives have proven long lasting and exist beyond the original viewer due to a greater accuracy to some truth of the universe? (Example: Einsteins General and Special Relativity)
principles and axioms are not subject to this flaw, and can often be identified inside many matters that people claim are arbitrary, and contravention of said principles and axioms also at play in fallacious arguments defending immoral behaviours.
modern people are trained to just agree with whatever they are told, in order to not suffer from the pain of social stigma and thinking. so they try to avoid having any views on anything and don't want to defend principles.
such people are all going to hell.