Plurality is white, so you can spin your stats however you want.
That doesn’t change the fact that I don’t want to pay into a welfare state to support *poor* people, because I believe in meritocracy.
I would feel the same if it was a state welfare and I lived in Utah or West Virginia.
Some level of charity is necessary.
However, are you aware that our ENTIRE federal debt is because of blacks?
Each one on average costs America 750k.
That’s literally paying retards not to riot.
The point is, even if it was all white people, I would be against the policy.
My objection is not race related.
Charity should be voluntary.
Federal government should be the minimum as spelled out in the constitution, and there’s no charity listed.
The “promote the general welfare” clause has been stretched too far.
You can believe in meritocracy all you want.
You can believe what charity “should” be all you want.
You can believe what the federal government “should” be all you want.
It isn’t going to change what these groups believe one iota.
I’m just showing data.
Utah doesn’t accurately report
But this is WV
White: 395,280 ÷ (1,780,000 × 0.93) ≈ 239/1,000 (~23.9%)
• Black: 73,200 ÷ (1,780,000 × 0.037) ≈ 1,114/1,000 (~111%) → this suggests data reporting mix or small base; likely Black population estimate ~65,860 implies ~1.11 enrollees per resident
• Other races: 19,520 ÷ (~63,460 people) ≈ 307/1,000 (~30.7%)
