Six month hardforks is an exaggeration. Necessary hardforks to improve privacy and efficiency. No contentious hardforks because Monero users value protocol improvements. Unlike 2017 Bitcoin blocksize wars and segwit half measure. Couldn't even avoid userbase splits even without hardforks. Meanwhile Bitcoin still has zero default privacy and coinjoins are weak obfuscation.

Monero has strong default privacy, real world fungibility, and magnitudes cheaper txs fees than Bitcoin. Monero is a better p2p digital cash. Bitcoin can excel in it's SoV niche.

You're going to have to backup "mediocre to provide any meaningful privacy improvements" comment while Bitcoin transaction graph and amounts are completely open.

Monero:

Maybe Alice sent $[?] to [?]

Bitcoin:

Alice definitely sent $X to Bob

No one is forcing you to store your wealth in it... You can't walk and chew gum?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

#Bitcoin LN:

Maybe Alice sent $[?] to [?]

The 'necessary' hardforks your shirtcoin that offers a temporary privacy are always decided at the top, kicking out all users that disagree with them. Congrats 🤙💜

#Real Bitcoin LN:

Maybe Alice sent $X to Bob

Your reciever privacy blows and amounts can be discovered. And all criticisms of "temporary privacy" also apply to LN as anyone can be collecting that data to break in the future as well:

"We identified 27,183 private channels, discovered hidden balances, and showed how a passive adversary can infer payment endpoints with very high probability."

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.12470.pdf

Your hardforks also apply to LN. You kick out all users that disagree. Congrats on the cognitive dissonance 🤙