I'm not a fan of vaccines but to say there's no research supporting them is incorrect

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It is correct to say that there is literally no research supporting vaccines. I’ve been going at this for years now.

That is not correct. I, personally, don't agree with a lot of the research on vaccines and I, personally, wouldn't take the COVID vaccine again myself. But just because I don't agree with something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. There's is plenty of supporting research for vaccines just like there's plenty of supporting research against vaccines. I don't think you're looking at actual scientific research if you haven't seen that (which I also say to the people passionately declaring there's no research supporting anti-vaxxers).

Still waiting for a link to a study

I am confused, I have provided the link. To get around the paywall go to Sci-Hub and insert the DOI. Where are you having trouble with the link? I can send you the PDF if you can't access Sci-Hub yourself for whatever reason.

But also, it's seeming like you just don't want to look at it. Which is also ok! It's just weird to declare it doesn't exist.

This is the Sci-Hub link I used but it's better to generate your own with the DOI

https://sci-hub.ru/https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-410X(94)90241-0

Not sure if something is wrong with my phone but this link only shows me the first page. I can’t see anything else and there’s a cat on the side.

Yes you'd have to get the full PDF which is available on that site. The cat and raven are images that the Sci-Hub site have in the margins while you look at the PDF in browser. I'm not sure why you can't scroll in your browser. But again this is seeming like you just don't want to look 😂

Idk why you keep saying i don’t want to look when im offering sats for it

I do want to look at it that’s why I asked for it. But my original note asks you to give the link to me. Not to tell me to look through Google scholar myself. I’ve looked plenty of times and couldn’t find anything. Here is my original note. And by the way, science isn’t just reading the title or abstract of a study. A lot of times the methods are trash and/or very limited due to funding issues or other things. But most people don’t actually read research they just repeat headlines. And big pharma banks on people’s laziness and ignorance.

nostr:note1t6awchvszenh7tdps8g5cn5rsr38m0fl44tzumjr0ghmytgzr8lqf84n64

Look, you have an axe to grind and that's fine. But it would be better served by showcasing research that supports your argument instead of declaring there's no research against your argument. All you've proven is you can't actually access research the way most researchers do 🤷‍♀️

Pretty retarded conclusion. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim. Pharma and brainwashed doctors claim that vaccines prevent disease. They should prove that themselves.