I've pasted two links in this thread which contain abstracts and summaries, are you not able to open them? There are also studies which validate your opinions, but it's obvious you haven't looked if you're declaring there are no studies supporting vaccines. Google Scholar is a great source for searching through peer reviewed papers, and if it's paywalled but prior to 2021 you should be able to find a PDF on scihub.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0264410X94902410
I'm not a fan of vaccines but to say there's no research supporting them is incorrect
It is correct to say that there is literally no research supporting vaccines. I’ve been going at this for years now.
That is not correct. I, personally, don't agree with a lot of the research on vaccines and I, personally, wouldn't take the COVID vaccine again myself. But just because I don't agree with something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. There's is plenty of supporting research for vaccines just like there's plenty of supporting research against vaccines. I don't think you're looking at actual scientific research if you haven't seen that (which I also say to the people passionately declaring there's no research supporting anti-vaxxers).
Still waiting for a link to a study
I am confused, I have provided the link. To get around the paywall go to Sci-Hub and insert the DOI. Where are you having trouble with the link? I can send you the PDF if you can't access Sci-Hub yourself for whatever reason.
But also, it's seeming like you just don't want to look at it. Which is also ok! It's just weird to declare it doesn't exist.
This is the Sci-Hub link I used but it's better to generate your own with the DOI
https://sci-hub.ru/https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-410X(94)90241-0
Not sure if something is wrong with my phone but this link only shows me the first page. I can’t see anything else and there’s a cat on the side.
Yes you'd have to get the full PDF which is available on that site. The cat and raven are images that the Sci-Hub site have in the margins while you look at the PDF in browser. I'm not sure why you can't scroll in your browser. But again this is seeming like you just don't want to look 😂
Idk why you keep saying i don’t want to look when im offering sats for it
I do want to look at it that’s why I asked for it. But my original note asks you to give the link to me. Not to tell me to look through Google scholar myself. I’ve looked plenty of times and couldn’t find anything. Here is my original note. And by the way, science isn’t just reading the title or abstract of a study. A lot of times the methods are trash and/or very limited due to funding issues or other things. But most people don’t actually read research they just repeat headlines. And big pharma banks on people’s laziness and ignorance.
nostr:note1t6awchvszenh7tdps8g5cn5rsr38m0fl44tzumjr0ghmytgzr8lqf84n64
Look, you have an axe to grind and that's fine. But it would be better served by showcasing research that supports your argument instead of declaring there's no research against your argument. All you've proven is you can't actually access research the way most researchers do 🤷♀️
Pretty retarded conclusion. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim. Pharma and brainwashed doctors claim that vaccines prevent disease. They should prove that themselves.
It looks like the placebo participants had a similar outcome in the influenza one:
“Patients potentially at risk showed a response similar to the other participants.”
So this also looks suspect.
But still. Thanks for trying.
🙄
Did you read the abstract?
'I FEEL that vaccines do nothing positive for anyone, so that means I don't trust them and will cherry-pick my debate argument statements and refute any evidence which goes against my FEELINGS on the topic.
Further, facts, along with logic and reason, will be thrown out /my/ fuckin' window. You can keep yours, I don't need these, at all, because I'm right and you're wrong!
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEER YOU'RE WRONG AND IM SO RIGHT!
That's you, btw. Just wanted you to know.
If you wanted to disprove their therapeutic use, then why not research vaccines to be sure so we will all be safe? If you're not actively working in this field, then why can't you kindly keep your cunt opinion to yourself?
You sound vaccinated.
You sound retarded, retard. George Washington vaxxed his troops. I'm guess you don't even wash your hands after jerking off.
Maybe you should go pray to Jesus about it. That'll solve your problems about vaccines, for sure.
Burying your head in the sand doesn't make the problems go away, just so that's clear. I'd rather we understand infections and other maladies so that humans can continue living and breathing, not unwillingly dying to otherwise PREVENTABLE, unnatural causes.
I don't think you truly give a shit about the sanctity of life with this stance you're taking, so maybe it's time to hang up your cross.
He’s definitely double jabbed and boosted. Don’t waste your time on that clown I had him muted a long time ago.
Do research is not just reading the abstract or title of a study and parroting what the media says. When you look at the methods of these papers, and you’re not a retard, you’ll find that it’s all garbage.
