yeah, maybe -- but I think we need to have some control over this, right now it's all-or-nothing -- you follow them across all of nostr or you follow them nowhere -- I think some level of granularity is important.
Not sure where's the UX balance yet though.
Perhaps if I follow someone on Olas then when I open Amethyst it can ask me "oh, I see you followed XX's pictures, do you want to see their tweets too? [Yes] [Always]"
I don't know, that's probably a bad UX since it has a large cognitive load.
Perhaps Amethyst could start showing me some of their kind:1s too with a "follow" button next to them, kinda like the new person's content starts creeping in into my feed
Not sure.
That said, moving away from a huge follow list has been long overdue; the right UX of how much granularity is the right level is still to be seen.
So if I saw you streaming and I followed you on zapstream, I wouldnât get your notes if I didnât folllow you outside of zapstream?
Trying to understand this.
If this is the case, I would expect more confusion and frustration of not seeing what that person is saying.
If you could get all of their content by default on follow, and then choose to opt out of kinds, that could work.
Or a regular âFollowâ, but if you click and hold (or right click etc) you get an option to âCustom Followâ.
I think the marketplace example is very good. Just because youâre selling a bunch of music gear that I might be interested in buying, doesnât mean I want to see your social posts.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
I love this idea. Fwiw, I think it would be neat if kind specific follows offered an "all" option alongside it. Then in other clients, you would have the option to trim it back by unsubscribing from the kinds supported there. If that makes sense lol
Thread collapsed
