If their are no trademarks or ways to register intellectual property how could you prove it is fraud... maybe the person experienced the exact sequence of ideas as Lyn and wrote them down? If ideas are not subject to rivalry as you claim this would be perfectly acceptable
Discussion
That's ridiculous. Time stamp a hash of your book in the blockchain to prove when it was complete. And any word for word reproduction that came after that would be obvious & provable fraud.
Modifications of the general ideas are already legal to publish as your own. You could feed a book into an AI & get it to spit out the same message in defferent words & sell that today.
But you recognize that the book that Lyn just published is her intellectual property?
No, I just don't think any "intellectual property" is required to say that it's a fraudulent lie to copy something word for word & then claim the words were the product of your mind & not hers. I am against plagerism.
I'm with ya there. Plagiarism is bad because it steals another person's ideas and claims them as ones own