That's ridiculous. Time stamp a hash of your book in the blockchain to prove when it was complete. And any word for word reproduction that came after that would be obvious & provable fraud.
Modifications of the general ideas are already legal to publish as your own. You could feed a book into an AI & get it to spit out the same message in defferent words & sell that today.
But you recognize that the book that Lyn just published is her intellectual property?
No, I just don't think any "intellectual property" is required to say that it's a fraudulent lie to copy something word for word & then claim the words were the product of your mind & not hers. I am against plagerism.
I'm with ya there. Plagiarism is bad because it steals another person's ideas and claims them as ones own
