In this I fully agree with nostr:npub1ej493cmun8y9h3082spg5uvt63jgtewneve526g7e2urca2afrxqm3ndrm
Discussion
nostr:npub1qqqqqqqrxtrcx8vut2vlrqa0c2qn5mmf59hdmflkls8dsyg9vmnqsclxwk can you elaborate?
My P2QRH proposal doesn't replace ECC, it augments it with PQC. This is called hybrid cryptography, so there's no regression in security model, only additional security.
Time to start hanging swamp overlords
We can always stay ahead of quantum computing by upping the encryption standards and complexity. (i.e., Have faith that our "geeks" will be able to outwit any potential governmental threat to privacy)
The issue really is whether the government will outlaw such standards...(and even more interesting will be how they might try to enforce such a ban).
The ONLY reason for a government to be anti-encryption is because they are totalitarian. (Don't be fooled by the "well terrorists use it" argument).
Thank God Bitcoin has brilliant minds like Peter's that help us grasping those things
This is how I feel about the Rust programming language