this is what happens when you stop believing the indoctrination and start thinking for yourself

https://nostpic.com/media/a3ce3b178db030c5bdcddd1aa7c9a9127ecb17f16f7daaf5d8216860b7588d3c/aa5fb09d2cefa6700c703a626151d44ef5ac33b199a57e2949a474ab7b604521.webp

when supplemented with Citrus or just Vitamin C the Carnivore diet can resolve many health issues which in case of this woman is evident on her face ...

i personally don't avoid plants - i just realize that humans evolved around a meat-centric hunter-gatherer diet, and that mechanically harvested grains and seed oils are unnatural, and i eat accordingly ...

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

People are brainwashed and believe doctors when they say that cholesterol is bad for you. No one says anything about grain sludge and seed oils are bad.

the media shoots endless documentaries about dangers of anorexia because like 2 or 3 models have died from it ... millions die from Obesity but you have to stay "body positive" though !

doctors also constantly warn people against taking multivitamins because "there is no scientific proof that they work" ... meanwhile they don't warn anybody against feeding their children cereal when grain diets are PROVEN to cause stunting in children and in fact Kellogg has invented cereal in order to stop boys from masturbating

cereal for boys is the chemical version of circumcision

we let Niggers and Muzzies rape our women while we castrate our own boys

Its not rocket science, but its also not for the lazy & cheap.

25%-30% of hunter-gather calories come from starchy plants, so theres no need to be a purist either, of course.

But the 80%+ starch-and-seed-oil diet so many people choose seems to start disabling them at around 40 y o IME...

people who refuse to touch plants aren't "purists" they are idiots. it is very hard to get enough Vitamin C without plants ( or supplements )

and yet 99% of plants in nature are inedible ( versus 100% of animals being edible ).

and Vitamin C is only present in fresh sour foods like Citrus, Kiwis, Strawberries etc. of course calorie for Calorie Kiwis and Strawberries are orders of magnitude more expensive than Goy-Slop that most people subsist on ...

here is the thing though - when you have your feet amputated due to diabetes or become paralyzed from a stroke you would gladly give any amount of money to restore your health but that won't be an option anymore ...

suffer the pain of discipline or suffer the pain of consequences ...

yeah i agree with you - the person on SAD ( standard american diet ) starts getting disabled at about age 40.

the person who takes optimum care of themselves starting from their mother eating right before they are even born will only start becoming disabled at around age 70.

that's the difference between retiring comfortably and going bankrupt from medical bills and killing yourself.

Humans haven't evolved around a meat centric diet. Humans have evolved around an omnivorous diet. Meat and plant consumption varied depending on food availability influenced by a number of factors, like climate, location and season.

"It’s [Hadza's diet] a balance between calories from animals and calories from plants. The long-term average is around 50:50, but it varies. Sometimes they’re eating a lot of meat, sometimes very little."

https://knowablemagazine.org/content/article/food-environment/2022/our-ancestors-paleo-diet-had-carbs

"The diet of prehistoric humans was determined by the seasons, the availability of resources, climatic conditions, and the biotope they lived in. With a lifestyle dominated by gathering, the available food consisted primarily of plants (80%) such as leafy greens, sweet grasses, nuts, seeds, tubers, berries, roots, fruits, and pulses as well as animal proteins from wild animals and fish (20%)."

"In principle, humans are omnivores by biological design. Unlike other species, they are food generalists, which means that they do not make any specific demands on their diet. This allows them to survive under diverse conditions in almost all geographical regions by consuming a wide range of organic substances provided by the animal and plant worlds." - Nutrition and Health in Human Evolution–Past to Present

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9460423/

"The study, analyzing remains from the Wilamaya Patjxa and Soro Mik’aya Patjxa sites in Peru, reveals an 80 percent plant-based and 20 percent meat diet among early Andeans."

"The commonly used term “hunter-gatherers” for describing early humans should be revised to “gatherer-hunters” in the context of the Andes in South America [...]."

"For these early humans of the Andes, spanning from 9,000 to 6,500 years ago, there is indeed evidence that hunting of large mammals provided some of their diets. But the new analysis of the isotopic composition of the human bones shows that plant foods made up the majority of individual diets, with meat playing a secondary role."

https://scitechdaily.com/rewriting-history-groundbreaking-new-research-reveals-that-early-human-diets-were-primarily-plant-based/

"Our results unequivocally demonstrate a substantial plant-based component in the diets of these hunter-gatherers. This distinct dietary pattern challenges the prevailing notion of high reliance on animal proteins among pre-agricultural human groups."

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-024-02382-z

"The real Paleolithic diet, though, wasn’t all meat and marrow. It’s true that hunter-gatherers around the world crave meat more than any other food and usually get around 30 percent of their annual calories from animals. But most also endure lean times when they eat less than a handful of meat each week."

"Year-round observations confirm that hunter-gatherers often have dismal success as hunters. The Hadza and Kung bushmen of Africa, for example, fail to get meat more than half the time when they venture forth with bows and arrows."

"No one eats meat all that often, except in the Arctic, where Inuit and other groups traditionally got as much as 99 percent of their calories from seals, narwhals, and fish."

"“Frankly, I think that misses half of the story. They want meat, sure. But what they actually live on is plant foods.” What’s more, she found starch granules from plants on fossil teeth and stone tools, which suggests humans may have been eating grains, as well as tubers, for at least 100,000 years—long enough to have evolved the ability to tolerate them."

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/foodfeatures/evolution-of-diet/?topicId=article.20200729093231781

Yes.

Now show me where they were getting 80%+ calories from processed cereals and seed oils.

Cereals are ultra-processed foods and shouldn't be part of any diet. The seed oil hysteria doesn't make any sense. Seed oils are made of the oil of seeds.

The inconvenient of oils is their concentration in fats. It'd easy to over consume fats. It's always best to consume the grain, seed, or fruit in its whole form. You get the full mix of fat, fiber, protein, sugar, polyphenols,...

Selectively bred, grain fed, chicken litter fed, hormones and antibiotics pumped, industrially produced and processed beef is unnatural too.

The natural way is to chase, kill, and process wild game yourself. No gun or crossbow, that's not natural.

game meat is best.

raising your own cattle 2nd best.

store bought 100% grass fed organic beef close enough.

personally i buy grass fed organic ground beef from Sam's Club.

nostr:npub1acg6thl5psv62405rljzkj8spesceyfz2c32udakc2ak0dmvfeyse9p35c raises his own sheep.

Joe Rogan hunts his own game.

So you appreciate the convenience of the modern production of meat, through standardization and mechanization, but reject the mechanization of grain and seed harvesting.

By the way, their is nothing natural about having you pre-cut and pre-pakakage meat shipping to your door.

i just used the words "mechanically harvested" to keep things short and sweet.

grains are poison regardless of how they are produced.

societies with grain based diets all have stunted children and sick adults.

except the Japs with their rice, but the Japs eat a lot of fish.

it's not about effort but about the results.

i believe in minimizing effort and maximizing results

i am all for mechanically harvesting grass and feeding it to cows, then eating ground beef.

but i don't even eat animals that were fed grains, let alone eat grains myself.

if you still have trouble understanding i will mute you.

thanks.

What makes grains poisons?

What are the proofs of the causality between grains and stunted children and sick adults? Which country/region does have those problems?

grains are not meant by nature to be eaten. being poisonous is their self defense mechanism. animals use running, hiding and fighting as self defense mechanisms instead. animals have excretory system - plants do not. plants accumulate poisons and use them for self defense.

as for proof i already told you - there is a strong correlation between high-grain, low-meat diet ON A NATION LEVEL and stunting in children. google it.

countries like India that have high-carb, low-meat consumption have high rates of stunting and diabetes. and vice versa countries like South Korea that have high meat consumption have long life expectancy.

google is your friend. these things are only controversial if you search for pre-canned conclusions. if you search for data it is not ambiguous.