It appears that this is much bigger than just stealing because most thieves are thrilled to get away with stealing anything scott free. So why is that not the case here?!☀️🌬️🧂✨💖
Discussion
So I’ve been looking to get a bike, right?!
So I found this sweet gravel Scott frame that’s just about right, and the salesman saying you’ll kiss the ground and my hip feeling needing replacement has me needing to sleep on it.
A sane mind would go take a hint bruh, broken hips are a bitch, kissing the ground hard, but now I know.
Does that matter?
Stupid be like, I wanna know.
Can it be undone?
Avoiding riding Scott would be simple way, but the hard way is more fun 
What do you do?
I was so conflicted about the film “The Founder” based on Roy Kroc. It’s a highly contentious film because it forces the viewer to choose a side. I side with “The Founder” Roy Kroc. I don’t see him as a thief. The brothers sold him their name and rights and company fair and square. But I have had heated debates with many people who don’t see it that way. This is an excellent movie though.☀️🌬️🧂✨💖
I met a very interesting person at the water fountain and he was carrying a Psycho Bunny bag. I’m somewhat partial to bunnies so I wanted to know who is the Psycho Bunny customer. This brand was born out of defiance but I wouldn’t call it theft. The founder gave up everything to come to America and work for Polo. He was fired after six weeks due to creative differences and thus the brand was born.
The ethos of the brand is inspired by pirates hence the skull and bones logo and states that it borrows heavily from meme culture. They even go as far as saying this…
“In the 17th century, pirates were the democracy. They're all about risk and reward."
“Unlike Ralph Lauren that represents a studied WASP aspiration, Psycho Bunny feels fresh and modern”.
Well I *love* Ralph Lauren and Polo a lot.👚👕But Psycho Bunny seems cool too. There’s plenty of room for both to coexist. I think it offers an alternative and appeals to those who are anti-establishment and anti-mainstream. LOL.☀️🌬️🧂✨💖 
The people who barely appear in the film are really the reason why it all went that way. The banksters. The brothers could have patented but that wasn't their style, and wouldn't have changed anything because their integrity would have again been compromised by these money elite types.
The end result was the worst fiat food there is, and the annihilation of thousands of little burger joints that made food not so far from the brother's standard of quality.
Wow. Thanks so much for chiming in. This is exactly what I’m talking about. The film has angered so many people and each side is on the furthest most point of the continuum. Like there’s no middle ground. It’s either “I want Mc Donald’s now” *or* “I will never eat at McDonald’s ever again.” I find the majority side with the brothers. But I don’t. I do empathize with them because of how Kroc treated at the end that was uncalled for.💖
You saw how those diners were run back then. It was a horrible experience. If it weren’t for Roy Kroc we would still be waiting 3 hours for a plate of mashed potatoes or whatever.💖
This logic can also be applied to Ford Hershey, Edison, Walmart, the internet, Bitcoin basically any new innovation. There are always trade offs but overall the good outweighs the bad. But then again the fast food epidemic is very very bad but that is something entirely different and points towards larger societal issues. It didn’t start out that way.💖
