How do you solve that?
Discussion
Depends on the language and/or support. Could be that someone figure it out through a conversation or a guess or checking site package source code or decompiling code. Or if it’s truly a closed source project, via a client support rep. Ultimately someone posts about it somewhere and then chaptgpt knows the new argument.
Yeah, I think the only reason we aren’t 100% on the same page, is I tend to talk about its capabilities if we allow it out of its sandbox.
Not sure if you’ve played with AutoGPT or seen the plug-in things people have done. For the sandboxed tool most people use - I’d agree, it’s frozen in time and unable to ask anyone for support.
Thinking more generally about its capabilities, I think it could handle all that. AutoGPT for example could find the contact info of the rep, and ask them what’s going on
Also, we’re talking about GPT-4 right?
Right! But it’s still relying on a human in this context. Maybe it breaks our current ecosystem by not then storing that information into a publicly accessible place like stack overflow and makes us dependent on the knowledge or hordes. But what you’re describing still required missing data to be provided to it by a human.
