⚡️🎙️ WATCH - This Chinese dissident has the entire internet questioning how many humans truly exist after she claimed China's population is actually under 500 million instead of 1.4 billion.
https://blossom.primal.net/2310d5989ed9d792f0055a4e49c682e8feb590dcda2b2eaa93eb5f09c905982b.mp4
Fir anyone that has spent any time in China this is way too much tin foil hat stuff.
They had one child policy for 30yrs how could they have any population growth?
30 years?
The population is probably a lot lower than the ccp claims.
But nowhere near as low as this lady claims.
I've seen a lot of videos showing well known cities virtually empty at supposedly busy times but i have no way to validate the claim.
As for the ghost cities, they built far more homes and apartments than they needed for investment purposes and the market collapsed.
Lower death rate. Growing but aging
It's American brainrot
🤖 Tracking strings detected and removed!
🔗 Clean URL(s):
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=m2m7_Iqd5to
❌ Removed parts:
&pp=ygUPRGFubnkgam9iZXMgbGVp
Wow crazy
Guess that kinda seems more likely true than not
There was a big story a few years ago about "Ghost Cities" where because the Chinese government doesn't let its citizens play with capitalist things like the stock market etc. everyone put their spare money into new homes. The population data seemed to indicated that China would easily fill them but they stayed empty. They then tried to explain this as people were choosing to go to university rather than straight into a job, so the home data was a couple of years adrift but they would come... They are still waiting and the housing economy bubble has well and truly popped now.
Perverse incentives lead to perverse outcomes
🧡👊🏻🍻
Please no more new rabbit holes 😭
400m wait no 500m
I projected it lol
Gemini has convincing arguments for the misscount being of the order of 100 million, not 1 billion.
Reasons for growth with 1 child policy are that life expectancy moved from 44 to 77 years, so while fewer kids were born, many fewer olds died.
Caloric consumption and other economic and industrial factors can't be explained with less than a billion people.
I asked Grok to estimate the population based on first principles and it also came up with 1.3 billion https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5LWNvcHk_af6c7f9a-2b94-4234-820d-a7ad721a3acc
reasoned from the conclusion obviously
mmm interesting
Life expectancy is not reliable.
It's very one sided due to millions and millions of death in wars.
Didn't they also conqueror a country or two during that time?
4 decades of one child policy?
But she checked with AI though so the math checks out 😂
The fish population going to launch a class action lawsuit
Here is one more thing I never questioned in my life before.
