Nostr Web Client

Replying to

Sat Nakamoto

1 sat zaps are failing. Feels like we’re hitting the physical limits of the lightning network.

MAHDOOD 1mo ago

Bro I've been telling you 1 sat zaps are wasteful lmao

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Sat Nakamoto 1mo ago

So why allow sats at all? Just get rid of it like we’re getting rid of pennies.

BITwise 🐳 >>= RIGHTish 1mo ago

Who's they and what exactly are they allowing?!

Sat Nakamoto 1mo ago

I originally wanted to pressure test the lightning network. I guess I finally ran into its limits.

MAHDOOD 1mo ago

You aren't pressure testing the lightning network with a coinos wallet 🤣

Sat Nakamoto 1mo ago

Even with a custodial, it failed so why go further?

MAHDOOD 1mo ago

Yea just sell all your bitcoin lol buy monero

Sat Nakamoto 1mo ago

If monero fixes my problem I would buy some, but it doesn’t. Yet.

BITwise 🐳 >>= RIGHTish 1mo ago

It depends on the endpoints and connected channels along a given route. I can 1 sat zap most people just fine from my node as long as I pay the fees to route it. Coinos probably limits your min send. Thats not a lightning network limitation.

Sat Nakamoto 1mo ago

Looks like I can zap you 1 sat just fine.

BITwise 🐳 >>= RIGHTish 1mo ago

Im receiving zaps thru coinos so we r just trading ious ;)

Sat Nakamoto 1mo ago

Centralization has its value.

MAHDOOD 1mo ago

Custodial lightning wallets aren't really lightning transactions

Sat Nakamoto 1mo ago

So what are they?

MAHDOOD 1mo ago

IOUs

MAHDOOD 1mo ago

You are using a custodial wallet man what do you expect lmao

Sat Nakamoto 1mo ago

It was working fine until recently. It’s still a data point. Even if I wasn’t using a custodial, it wouldn’t prove anything more. I see I can still zap you 1 sat fine, so it depends on who I am zapping. Anyway. GN.