The worse part about bluesky is its "Reputation System", which can limit your reach in the "What's hot" section if you said something "hateful".

Even if someone you invite (with invitation code) ends up saying something "hateful", that will also negatively impact your "reputation."

This is North Korea type Censorship.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I’m sorry #[2]

🤣

Damn, didn’t know about this…

Signed up a few days ago, but to be honest I prefer the vibes on Nostr. When I saw the first .eth in the name I didn’t really look at it again except open it every now and then, closing it and heading back to #nostr 😅

Under the hood, there is no decentralization. That entire platform is running on a single server hosted by Bluesky.

For now, but then it's just going to be a federated where your still dependant of the admin of this server

That was one of the first things Nostr did, and everything else was built later. Nostr prioritized decentralization over moderation.

Oh i am sure that wont be abused in any way lol

Exactly, these systems have never been abused. We should just trust them I guess.

#nostr is the way. Same as #bitcoin. You won't be able to replace either one with some other bullshit idea.

Criticizing our "prestige protocol" deducts you -3K points. Please do your best and not spread doubts to our fair system 👁️

Gross

The second an algorithm controls what is seen, the social network becomes pointless

Yup, Chinese style social credit score. (This type of control is going to be tried everywhere…)

I think something can be done to assess online trustworthiness, but more by rewarding good behavior and long lasting and diverse relationship than punishing bad behavior.

Trust is a link built and maintained over time.

I don't hate recommendation algorithms, that's quietly literally my main field but they should be used for discovery not for censorship.

A global, top-down "reputation" is a horrible idea. Instead we need a bottom-up approach.

We need "Trust Lists" that work like follow lists and block lists only they're the people you trust to moderate your content for you. So let people in your community determine the reputations of people - don't leave it to some global censor.

Given that that article is a dozen years old - do you know if anyone has studied to see if it still holds water. A lot has happened on the topic of online credibility in the past decade…

Sadly the interesting stuff I found was behind paywalls. I just found it interesting in its approach.

I’ve done a few rounds of search on the topic as I see it as the base for a whole lot of stuff (in my case decentralized academic accreditation) but I’d say from what is available freely nobody has cracked it, and there are some pretty horrible ideas floating.

Probably the people having done the most work on this are cybersecurity firms, they looked at assessing the true nature of their online adversaires. Some seem quite satisfied with their models. But they have they own metrics, which do not translate well into other areas.

Top down approach is the key ingredient for corruption to be effective

Woow, that's neat! Now they only need to link it to every aspect of your offline life and make it the mandatory and only legal social media.

Do you know 9gag ?

It's image-commentary site I guess 🤔

🫣 ooooo interesting

does bluesky support alternative clients like damus?

The blue bird app does this as well, correct?