they should just auth. easy as pie. auth. you get auth, you sign event with auth as content wrapped in auth envelope

i can't believe i am 4 months into this and nobody gets this?

you see auth, auth. end of. fucks sake it's not rocket science

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That's already, what happens? Heheeee. I don't blame clients too much, the only auth implementations for strfry relays have been closed source and so it's been a long slow road for clients to care about supporting it.. but as far as I can tell, a lot of em do..

closed source

mazin can go fuck himself, i'm pissed and i want a fucking refund

Eh I mean, you were asking about monetization and closed source stuff it's been working for this. Mazin's relay is a top dog relay and getting paid, for value add, with no grants. Same for the rest that kept it closed. Can't fault em for that I think. Eventually an open version will come out or other relay software will support it.

he didn't give anything back up to this point so i'm super dirty on him

doubly so because i PAID him

i believed him and he so fucking betrayed me, he's gonna have to do more than release the source of his shit

i'm gonna actively disrecommend nostr.wine from now on until i get some evidence that he's reformed from his closed source sins

With a great deal of hesitation towards even entering this conversation the only thing I want to say is that one of the reasons why several clients have NIP-42 is because we (nostr.wine) paid 500k sat bounties per client (Amethyst, Damus, Snort and Iris) and raised a lot of awareness about why NIP-42 matters.

I’m not sure why you think we owe you anything besides a reliable relay.

💯 absolutely zero clients would support auth if it wasn't for Mazin pushing it forward. 🙏

they still don't, unless you put "payment-required": true in the nip-11 as well

why have "auth-required" at all people

and i was railing against the clients up until i learned that one of the mechanisms existing for it, that i have contributed to by paying and using, does not enforce exclusivity of access to privileged messages, and it's closed source

i'm still feeling kinda cold on this because it's not logical, any of it, and it took such a lot of mean words to get anyone to even think about it properly

i've found there may be a bug in my code that is stalling the socket when error conditions occur tho... it does it with duplicate and maybe it also does it by the same mechanism when auth-required comes up

I replied to this note instead of the other but just want to make it clear that isn’t aimed towards you!