A paywall is not censorship πππ
Discussion
Itβs self censoring for self interest.
So people shouldn't get paid, and art/music/literature should all be free then?
Nothing wrong with paying for stuff. Or only do stuff for payment.
Asking for payment for something you made is self censorship?
It should be given to someone for nothing?
Am I missing something?
Yes, nobody said that second sentence.
You have hallucinated it.
π I did but I was just trying to take the next step.
π whoops π
I wasnβt really making a point, just being obtuse with Derek. Itβs just v. hard to do paywalls on nostr because nostr is censor resistant.
Content spreads to lots of uncontrolled placed very quickly here.
Yes, this is true. I was thinking of zap.stream in particular. Pay to unlock a stream of a creator etc. I think certain content lends itself to different monetization models.
Encryption for private content over nostr.
The main thing is to make it juat annoying enough