Avatar
Clockwerk
82bce7d21c2bea337a400e818e51544bd6edb9c396001d348b31a38265598ac2
Tick tock next block
Replying to Avatar HannahMR

Communism, in small groups, is the natural state of humans. It’s built into us to care about our fellow humans, and to share with them. This helps us all.

Things got complex once we started living in groups lager than Dunbar's number in villages and cities as our instinctual communism does not scale. This is when we develop money and ā€˜market economies’ as this does scale.

As our cities have grown in numbers, they have shrunk in community and connection. There are now a lot of people who are incredibly lonely as we are living unnaturally isolated lives, and this is a big part of what fuels anti-capitalist sentiments.

A lot of people who have perfectly natural and healthy human instincts make the error of trying to scale their sharing tendencies. They see ā€˜the state’ as their vehicle for recreating community care. These are the people who want the ā€˜social safety net’. And of course that is how humans are made to function, a community safety net is what we are built for. The issue, again, is with trying to scale it not only to above Dunbar’s number, but to millions of people.

People who don’t know how to connect with others, for any reason good or bad, the ā€˜anti-social’ people, some autistic people, sociopaths, etc. tend to become ā€œcapitalistsā€ in big part because they have less of the sharing instincts and have less ability to perceive the needs of others.

Quite often the ā€˜bleeding heart liberals’ are the more psychologically and relationally healthy people. Their big error isn’t in their instincts, it’s in not understanding that the policies their instincts want them to support were built for small groups and don’t scale to millions.

The solution here is to bring back the tight knit smaller communities, practice the natural communism in those groups, create social safety nets there, and to engage in ā€˜capitalism’ or ā€˜market economics’ with the broader world.

I will push back on one statement here about the notion of so-called "antisocials" (objecting to socialism ?)not always recognizing others needs or lacking some hypothetical sharing instinct.

At least in the case of autistic people, more so the issue is one of most exhibiting and learning social cues differently. This leads to receiving the culture (even family!) we are in differently, because there are few who have not had at least some continuous bad experience often due to factors totally out of any ones control like involuntary facial expressions. This makes the autistic mentally a nomad -more interrested in actualising a concrete vision of the real than conforming to social groups that likely think they are awkward anyway.

Theorists have noted a similarity to money/capitalism in the sense that autistics lack the normal community formed identity and so can often float (intellectually at least) between them very easily. There is less barrier to understanding foreign culture, language, animal language, nonhuman things like programming, math, computer and ai etc

This is similar to how money enables trustless extange between parties that don't know each other and lack the community ties that might make money somewhat unnecessary- and the objectivity of it is good for empowerment since it can be directly quantified in numeric form, which is much safer than being denied social clout for some ineffable reason such as"made awkward joke at party" or some such.

X is unironically less reliable at pulling up profiles than nostr- but with no decentralization. Unbelievable.

Made a favorate late night meal:

sardine pasta aglio e olio

It is truly hilarious to read certain liberal accounts convinced there is some vast bitcoin consensus on the right. It's so wildly inaccurate it borders on being a conspiracy theory.

Reality: The admin has indicated clearly via Lutnick et all that they want to create a stablecoin dollar. Possibly also wanting to overhaul the internal gov payments systems. To do this they would need the technical expertise of people across bitcoin and the broader crypto industry.

So they made favorable policies and did things like free ross to gain the support of the industry. There is no consensus broader than that. Most normie conservatives are not bitcoin supporters,own none or very little, and view it with considerable skepticism.

I still remain some what surprised that nostr has never been used by another crowd.

Like how hard would it be to take a typical app, set up a different set of nodes, and have... pretty much an entirely different experience socially.

The fact that the ability to see other systems like mastodon makes this doubly odd to me.

I have learned in the last few years that this notion of empathy as deep understanding of another's experience is a bit of a divergent viewpoint.

there is a more pragmatic definition of empathy- that is is the expression in the moment of that understanding, via word, tone, body language, eye contact,etc. This definition places the emphasis on the communication and timeliness it as a kind of shared explosional recognition

This is how many people who in fact have a deep well of internal feeling, understanding, etc may nevertheless less fail at being percieved as empathetic- because to fail in the timely successful expression is tantamount to the same thing from a relational standpoint.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

I haven't worn makeup in a decade in any public context. There was a bitcoin documentary that put some on me but I don't know if they aired it. Or maybe a brief moment. I don't know and don't care.

My husband often says I should wear makeup for special occasions. Which means he'd like to see it and I should practice more. I ignored this for years and he keeps reminding me, but this year I'm going to do better at it, for him. We have our 7-year anniversary coming up. I'm going to try to surprise him with it.

My argument previously was I can't be good at everything. If I'm going to run our main business then maybe it's fine if I'm not great at makeup. It's not that I don't have time, although that's a factor, but mainly I don't have mental bandwidth. I wear the same clothes, I don't wear makeup, I get the same haircut, and focus on finance and tech every day. When I'm alone for a season, separated by him due to travel, rather than figure out makeup I post too much on social media and write a 130k word science fiction novel manuscript (which in retrospective, he ends up really liking) to fill our time apart. So I'm like, "maybe makeup isn't me."

His argument, as a proper method to not insult his own wife, is that it would "be a shame to not ever dabble in make up", given how I could look in it.

Objectively it's a reasonable argument; there are plenty of iconic people that look totally different without makeup. His argument is that I should at least wear it sometimes. I've been meaning to give him that view for years but I keep putting it off. Years now.

But sometimes it's a character rather than a concept that brings us to an idea. Much like novels. It's about characters more-so than plot or worlds that wake you up to something.

So I see Kristi Noem at 53 with great makeup, looking amazing, getting sworn in as Secretary of Homeland Security.

All the politicians are thinking about her new position, but realistically myself and many other women are like, "fuck, that's my new 53 year old benchmark." She looks so good. Partially because she's attractive but also her makeup and hair are just so solid. I assume she'll be weak at the job but she'll look damn good doing it.

And so I think, "Well fuck, I hope I look half as good at 53 as she does. Maybe I can ignore this shit in my 30s but I have to figure it out by my 40s and 50s."

Anyway, that's my random vulnerable mental shit for Nostr.

Do it for yourself , not for others. it can be nerdy and fun.

Skincare is my favorite- biomaxx that aging process with the best peptides, exosomes, microbiome etc. Ended up learning about a bunch of stuff that way that's been fascinating. Topical stuff is a nice entry point.

If you bought in 1970 this is fantastic- but for everyone else the bar to entry to the most common middle class savings vehicle has become on reasonably high