Communism, in small groups, is the natural state of humans. It’s built into us to care about our fellow humans, and to share with them. This helps us all.

Things got complex once we started living in groups lager than Dunbar's number in villages and cities as our instinctual communism does not scale. This is when we develop money and ā€˜market economies’ as this does scale.

As our cities have grown in numbers, they have shrunk in community and connection. There are now a lot of people who are incredibly lonely as we are living unnaturally isolated lives, and this is a big part of what fuels anti-capitalist sentiments.

A lot of people who have perfectly natural and healthy human instincts make the error of trying to scale their sharing tendencies. They see ā€˜the state’ as their vehicle for recreating community care. These are the people who want the ā€˜social safety net’. And of course that is how humans are made to function, a community safety net is what we are built for. The issue, again, is with trying to scale it not only to above Dunbar’s number, but to millions of people.

People who don’t know how to connect with others, for any reason good or bad, the ā€˜anti-social’ people, some autistic people, sociopaths, etc. tend to become ā€œcapitalistsā€ in big part because they have less of the sharing instincts and have less ability to perceive the needs of others.

Quite often the ā€˜bleeding heart liberals’ are the more psychologically and relationally healthy people. Their big error isn’t in their instincts, it’s in not understanding that the policies their instincts want them to support were built for small groups and don’t scale to millions.

The solution here is to bring back the tight knit smaller communities, practice the natural communism in those groups, create social safety nets there, and to engage in ā€˜capitalism’ or ā€˜market economics’ with the broader world.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This sounds like a lot of communist cope.

I'm a libertarian.

Taleb argued in a similar way:

"I am, at the Fed level, libertarian; at the state level, Republican; at the local level, Democrat;

and at the family and friends level, a socialist.

If that saying doesn’t convince you of the fatuousness of left vs. right labels, nothing will."

Nassim Taleb once said it like that: With my family I am a communist, with my friends a socialist and with the state a libertarian

Yup. don't like him but do like that quote!

I have conflicting feelings about him

I will push back on one statement here about the notion of so-called "antisocials" (objecting to socialism ?)not always recognizing others needs or lacking some hypothetical sharing instinct.

At least in the case of autistic people, more so the issue is one of most exhibiting and learning social cues differently. This leads to receiving the culture (even family!) we are in differently, because there are few who have not had at least some continuous bad experience often due to factors totally out of any ones control like involuntary facial expressions. This makes the autistic mentally a nomad -more interrested in actualising a concrete vision of the real than conforming to social groups that likely think they are awkward anyway.

Theorists have noted a similarity to money/capitalism in the sense that autistics lack the normal community formed identity and so can often float (intellectually at least) between them very easily. There is less barrier to understanding foreign culture, language, animal language, nonhuman things like programming, math, computer and ai etc

This is similar to how money enables trustless extange between parties that don't know each other and lack the community ties that might make money somewhat unnecessary- and the objectivity of it is good for empowerment since it can be directly quantified in numeric form, which is much safer than being denied social clout for some ineffable reason such as"made awkward joke at party" or some such.

To be clear here, I'm am not considering being on the spectrum to be a negative. There are big advantages such as not getting caught in social contagions.

But, to clarify, are you agreeing that autistic people are less 'social' or just saying that they are differently social? ...are you saying that because they are differently social they get ostracized and become 'anti-social'?

Differently social.. Yes it causes issues. There is a growing body of research on the double empathy problem along these lines. Stuff like this:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13623613231219743#:~:text=Non%2Dautistic%20interactions%20and%20participants,Lay%20Abstract