That’s cute…

But what does it mean to “initiate aggressive violence against another peaceful individual”?

It seems trivial to say “murder, assault, coercion, theft, rape, trespassing, lying.”, but which court decides these cases?

And if that court decides in agreement with “any act that is taking a scarce good from another individual without the explicit consent and voluntary interaction”, then what state law defines “a scarce good” and “explicit consent”?

Anarchy is all well and good in theory… until rules are “required”.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yeah didn't want to get into a philosophical argument ( nostr:npub1klkk3vrzme455yh9rl2jshq7rc8dpegj3ndf82c3ks2sk40dxt7qulx3vt is your guy), just thought it was cool

Licenses are shitcoins anyway

Yea. Pretty simple. Ideas are not property. Kinsella is a good listen.

https://fountain.fm/episode/CLKtXzealvEzGlJADA5W

I guess it would be wise to explicitly mention an arbitration court as judge, but maybe that should be added by each project, and not in the vanilla license.

Statists gonna state. 🤓

My thought exactly. It always comes down to “somebody’s rules”.