Discussion
That’s cute…
But what does it mean to “initiate aggressive violence against another peaceful individual”?
It seems trivial to say “murder, assault, coercion, theft, rape, trespassing, lying.”, but which court decides these cases?
And if that court decides in agreement with “any act that is taking a scarce good from another individual without the explicit consent and voluntary interaction”, then what state law defines “a scarce good” and “explicit consent”?
Anarchy is all well and good in theory… until rules are “required”.
Yeah didn't want to get into a philosophical argument ( nostr:npub1klkk3vrzme455yh9rl2jshq7rc8dpegj3ndf82c3ks2sk40dxt7qulx3vt is your guy), just thought it was cool
Licenses are shitcoins anyway
Yea. Pretty simple. Ideas are not property. Kinsella is a good listen.
I guess it would be wise to explicitly mention an arbitration court as judge, but maybe that should be added by each project, and not in the vanilla license.
This has way more words than MIT's... How can it be more anarchist? 😂
anarchists love words 🤣
This reminds me of BipCot NoGov License.
```
If governments, agents and subcontractors of same use this software, or derivation of this software, all agencies and persons directly and knowingly involved may be shamed in public, by name, on the Internet, on radio, and in any media now extant or invented in the future, throughout the known universe and elsewhere, in perpetuity."
```
https://bipcot.org/stuff/BipCotNoGovSoftwareLicense-v1point2-software.txt
#fuckYeahBipCotNoGov