NIP-46 is kinda bleak right now.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

But it will improve.

It works!

Remote signing is pretty cool, right?!!!!

Better when it's custodial.

hahahahhahahaa

We need some good easy to use okta like nip-46 servers, probably places that provide both nip-05 and nip-46 as that’d cause the least confusion. And a push to get web clients to support nip-46. And some better documenation and help text.

One annoying issue is that on most clients you connect once using a bunker:// connection string with a relay address and then the app will just always only try that relay forever unless you logout and login again -- apparently.

Would be nice to have another relay list, like kind 10012, just for signaling relays that can be used in NIP-46 for each key -- and the signing device itself could update that so clients would pick that up.

And maybe another optional field in the NIP-05 JSON just for these relays too, for Pablo's flow?

I saw ephemeral events are removed in the rewrite PR? They break some things (also in NIP-47, there is no guarantee a wallet will be online when a request is made)